OK, let’s get something straight here: marriage is not a right, it’s a sacrament. A sacrament means it’s a religious rite. Protected by the First Amendment. The FIRST one you Star Chamber dumb-asses. Get over yourselves and stop with your politically correct “moralizing.” The SCotUS decision will have the effect of pushing the gay agenda into religious institutions by force, not our choice protected by the First Amendment.
God help me, seriously, God please help me. I cannot suffer these fools gladly. And neither
can St. Paul, so I pray I’m in good company:
12 But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we.
13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
16 I say again, let no man think me a fool; if otherwise, yet as a fool receive me, that I may boast myself a little.
17 That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting.
18 Seeing that many glory after the flesh, I will glory also.
19 For ye suffer fools gladly, seeing ye yourselves are wise.
20 For ye suffer, if a man bring you into bondage, if a man devour you, if a man take of you, if a man exalt himself, if a man smite you on the face.2 Corinthians, Ch11, v12-20
I know, I’ve proven myself less than Christian in my behavior and speech, but that doesn’t make the words any less relevant. It also doesn’t make them any less applicable to SCotUS or the liberals who think themselves wiser than the voting majority in California.
Why are ‘militant gays so adamant at tearing down an institution that I value in an effort to force me to validate/accept their lifestyle? Medical benefits and inheritance rights? Please people. You expect me to buy that? That doesn’t require an act of Congress to fix.
Simply put; they are having a classic hysterical tantrum that someone out there doesn’t want them around. They’re behaving as spoiled children who aren’t allowed to play in someone else’s yard because they shit in the sandbox. They don’t want to stop what they’re doing or have someone else tell them what they’re doing is wrong.
This was why the voting majority in California (!!!) felt they needed a law to protect marriage. They were fighting to protect their freedom of religious expression from being co-opted/defiled by a bunch of perverts and dullards who don’t see that they are eroding their rights to express their religion as they see fit.
I know I don’t want men marrying men or women marrying women in my church…Stay out! I don’t care if you are offended! Stay out until you see the error of your ways. People who are at this point in their lives would be unmoved by my proselytizing about the sin they are committing anyway.
I draw the line at you forcing me to accept what you do as right and valid. You have the right to pursue your life and beliefs for yourself. It’s not my problem if you have issues with my stance on the matter. Some of us in the world choose to find what you do as wrong and you will not change that. In fact, I’m teaching my children that what you do is wrong.
Gays scream about how oppressed they are, but the fact remains that they already have the right to enter into a contractual relationship with whomever they please. They can also be united in a civil ceremony and there are plenty of clergy out there who will marry them in their churches despite what their Bibles clearly tell them is an abomination before God.
So then, was SCotUS right about any of it? Yes they were. Hypocritical on my part? I leave it to you to suffer my foolishness.
Here’s the correct part of the decision; if they had made the decision that the law was Constitutional then it could create an environment tolerant of discrimination against gays based on the law.
This is America. I have the right to think and say what I want as long as I don’t prevent you from pursuing life, liberty, and happiness as you see it. The Constitution is a baseline for equal treatment among citizens of our nation. It is here to protect us all.
It’s a horrific shame that we have to explicitly spell out rules to protect an idea as basic as marriage. But hey, it’s no surprise considering how bad our schools are at teaching us our own history. This remains true however: this is America, satisfaction is not guaranteed, just the right to try to find it.
This California law that was under consideration wouldn’t even be viewed as necessary if it had not become glaringly apparent that Gay activists won’t quit until they’ve created a world where we’re all queer. Sorry, the tattoo on my ass says “Exit Only.” They’ll have to take me by force…but that’s a whole different perversion, eh?
So then the “moral” of the story for Gay activists? Get on with your lives and leave me to mine. Pushing this is pushing too far and you don’t want to face me in a fight because I won’t quit either. You think you’ve won? Don’t get too comfortable in that pew there. The battle’s not over.
Bottom line: We don’t have to be friends, we just have to co-exist, SCotUS decisions notwithstanding.
Clear enough?